proceedings and result, and refused an offer [by McAninch] to take the land off his hands

and [refused to] pay him [McAninch] the rent fixed by the referees – that he [Laughlin] has

continued in possession of the premises, and that Mary McAninch is still living [in 1842].

 

Defendant's counsel offered in evidence the will of Jas. McKee, dated 28th March, 1809,

proven 25th April, 1809, . . . with proof that the property was sold at sheriff's sale, as the

property of Henry McKee -- that he [James McKee, Sr.] left two sons, one of them named

Henry, and that the title to the land vested in him . . .

 

Evidence was given . . . that on the day of sale of the personal property, in 1809, the widow

got such articles of personal property as she was allowed under the will, except a saddle; that

some other article was spoken of, and not agreed on, and that it might have been the saddle

that was not furnished her — nothing said about it at the second sale of personal property.

That the will was read in the presence of the widow.

. . . 

1. The court erred in admitting the evidence offered by defendant . . .

2. The court erred in their charge to the jury . . .

Disposition: Judgment reversed and venire facias de novo awarded. [8]

 

Notes:

[1]

“McAninch and Wife v. Laughlin”, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; 13 Pa. 371;

 

1850 Pa. Lexis 83 / decided May 1850. Found on Lexis-Nexis by Richard Cochran,

 

Big Rapids, Michigan [www.lexisnexis.com (a subscription service), States Legal,

 

U.S. / Pennsylvania / Cases, PA Supreme Court Cases from 1791, MEGA / PENN]

[2]

Original case in the Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County, circa 1842;

 

“Verdict was rendered for defendant, Laughlin.” McAninch appealed “for error”

[3]

Alexander McAninch [b.ca.1795, Pennsylvania, per 1850 and 1860 Census records]

[4]

Mary (maiden name unknown) (McKee) McAninch, his wife

 

[Mary, born ca. 1782, Ireland (1850 Census); Mary is not found in the 1860 census]

[5]

married 1815 [Alexander McAninch, age about 20 years, and widow Mary McKee,

 

age about 33 years; presumably, they married in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania]

[6]

“She remained on the land” [with her husband, Alexander McAninch] . . . so,

 

the original (James Sr.) McKee land (now the property of Henry McKee) was sold

 

to Laughlin (“by a sheriff's deed”) while Mary was still living on the (McKee) land!

[7]

Mary's claim to ‘one-third dower’ of said real estate, by right of her deceased husband 

[8]

“Disposition: Judgment reversed and venire facias de novo awarded.”

 

“Venire do novo” or “venire facias de novo” – a new trial . . . granted by the

 

appellate court for error occurring during the course of the [original] trial . . .

 

[legal terms] http://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/usgenweb/nc/henderson/court/legal.txt

 

[it is not known whether there was a new trial, or if a summary judgment was entered;

 

with the final outcome already decided, there may not have been another trial anyway]

 

___________________________________________________________________________

McAninch Family History NL v.XV n.1 /  January 2007 / Copyright Frank McAninch / page 2007-05

 

Table of Contents for this Year

First Page of this Issue

Previous Page

Next Page