|
Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915, McAninch Chiropractors |
|
|
Iowa: 1915 -- Court case, John Earl McAninch and Cecil Sylvester McAninch, Chiropractors |
|
[John and Cecil, sons of David Franklin McAninch, of Brooklyn, Poweshiek County, Iowa, |
|
lost their original case, in Jasper County, and then lost their appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court] |
|
State of Iowa, Appellee, v. J. E. McAninch et al., Appellants. |
October, 1915, Decided |
|
Supreme Court of Iowa, Des Moines; 172 Iowa 96; 154 N.W. 399; 1915 Iowa Sup. Lexis 291 |
|
|
Prior History -- Appeal from Jasper District Court.--Hon. Henry Silwold, Judge. |
|
|
|
Tuesday, October 5, 1915. |
|
|
|
|
Sec. 2579 of the Code defines one practicing medicine, surgery or obstetrics, and being a physician, |
|
|
to be a person “who shall publicly profess to be a physician, surgeon or obstetrician, and assume |
|
|
the duties, or who shall make a practice of prescribing or of prescribing and furnishing medicine for |
|
|
the sick, or who shall publicly profess to cure or heal.” Sec. 2580, Code, is, among other things, that |
|
|
It shall be a misdemeanor for any person to “practice medicine, surgery or obstetrics in the state |
|
|
without having first obtained and filed for record” a prescribed certificate. The indictment at bar |
|
|
was presented on October 16, 1913, and charges that: |
|
|
“The said J. E. McAninch and C. S. McAninch that date to the finding of this indictment, in the |
|
county of Jasper and state of Iowa, did willfully and unlawfully assume the duties of a physician, |
|
and make a practice of treating persons afflicted with disease, and did then and there willfully and |
|
unlawfully, publicly profess to treat, cure and heal persons afflicted with disease, by a system of |
|
treatment called 'Chiropractic', without first having obtained from the state board of medical |
|
examiners of the state of Iowa, and recorded in the office of the county recorder of McAninch and |
|
C. S. McAninch to practice as such, contrary to and in violation of law.” |
|
The defendants interposed a demurrer, which . . . asserts that the indictment charges an impossible |
|
offense, and is otherwise insufficient under our statutes. They also interposed a plea in bar, claiming |
|
that the dismissal of an indictment found earlier than the one at bar operates as a bar to prosecution |
|
under the last indictment. On the overruling of demurrer and plea, pleas of not guilty were entered, |
|
and a conviction ensued. From the judgment entered on the verdict, defendants appeal. – Affirmed. |
|
Found in Lexis-Nexis by Richard Cochran, Big Rapids, Michigan, <rcochran@tucker-usa.com>. |
|
Richard said “This one pertains to John Earl and Cecil Sylvester McAninch, sons of David Franklin |
|
McAninch, of Brooklyn, Iowa. The whole case runs 17 pages; quite complicated, but it looks like |
|
the original case appealed from the Jasper County, Iowa District Court was upheld.” |
|
___________________________________________________________________________ |
|
McAninch Family History NL, v.XIII.n.3 / July 2005 / Copyright Frank McAninch / page 2005-21 |